+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Dual Core, or Core 2 Duo?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    20

    Default Dual Core, or Core 2 Duo?

    Is it better to have Dual Core 2.2GHz or to have Core 2 Duo 1.8 GHz?

  2. #2

    Default

    What type of dual core are you talking about?

    Generally, the Core 2 Duo will be better than the Core Duo or Pentium D as it is much better architecture. But if you're talking about a Pentium Dual Core, then that is the same architecture just with reduced cache and FSB.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    London
    Posts
    7

    Default

    1) Core Duo (Yonah)= Core Duo...substantial boost in performance over Pentium D, Much lower heat and power , Intel Core architecture...a very different architecture from Pentium D, primarily used in laptops

    2) Core 2 Duo(Merom)= enhanced Yonah....mild boost in performance but at the same price, extension of the Intel core architecture , used for both laptops as well as dekstops

    To draw an analogy, the difference between the Netburst (Pentium D ) and Core (Core Duo, Core 2 Duo) is akin to the difference between a PIII and a PIV (altogether different)

    The difference between Core Duo/Core 2 Duo is like the difference between say a AMD 64 venice and winchester though larger (enhanced version on the same architecture)

    Hope this clarifies the difference

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    6

    Default

    for me i much prefer to use core dou... now.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    6

    Default

    For performance, I would use Dual core2,2GB.

    Unless use on laptop, Core2 Duo1.8 is slower than 2.2, maybe the power consumption is lower.

    Hope this helps!
    Bill

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts